Approach
A summary of the village approach to options is set out in Table below, these are then be presented as site options in the next section.
Each village with an identified site option has been evaluated using the Department for Transport’s Connectivity Tool, which integrates transport and land use data to produce a national measure of connectivity for any location in England and Wales. This tool assigns each location a grade from A to J, where A indicates the highest level of connectivity within Bath and North East Somerset, and J the lowest.
The assessment is based on the current sustainable transport network and existing land uses such as schools and shops, and does not take into account planned or future improvements. The grading from A to F is not an overall ranking of site options and in deciding which sites are allocated in the Draft Local Plan other sustainability criteria and deliverability factors will also be considered.
Bathampton – Summary
| 5% Growth | Opportunities | Constraints | Option presented | Rationale |
|
40 dwellings over the Plan Period |
|
|
No |
Due to the constraints identified, no site options are proposed. However, opportunities for community-led growth (Pathway 1), including affordable housing through rural exception sites, could be explored. |
Batheaston – Summary
| 5% Growth | Opportunities | Constraints | Option presented | Rationale |
|
63 dwellings over the Plan Period |
|
|
No |
While no suitable sites have been identified within Batheaston itself due to significant constraints, adjoining land within Bathford parish—functionally part of the wider Batheaston settlement—may offer opportunities for mixed-use or economic development. These will be considered under Bathford’s growth strategy. |
Bathford – Summary
| 5% Growth | Opportunities | Constraints | Option presented | Rationale |
|
40 dwellings over the Plan Period |
|
|
Yes |
Opportunities for development have been identified on the edge of the village, including land along Box Road that may be suitable for mixed-use or economic development. Smaller sites within Bathford are also being considered. Some of this land adjoins Batheaston and may contribute to meeting wider settlement needs. |
Bishop Sutton – Summary
| 5% Growth | Opportunities | Constraints | Option presented | Rationale |
|
33 dwellings over the Plan Period |
|
|
Yes |
Working with the Parish and a local landowner, new land has been promoted to the west of the village, including an extension to Westway Business Park and new housing. If a longer-term view is taken, this could unlock access to constrained HELAA sites around Cappards Road and Stitching Shord Lane. A larger, potentially phased option is therefore being presented through this consultation, while noting constraints in terms of the Mendip Hills National Landscape, transport connectivity and agricultural land. |
Chew Magna – Summary
| 5% Growth | Opportunities | Constraints | Option presented | Rationale |
|
28 dwellings over the Plan Period |
|
|
Yes |
A site to the west of the village, comprising abandoned tennis courts off Dark Lane and located between the two infill boundaries, is being considered for development. The site may offer a suitable opportunity for proportionate growth, subject to further assessment of its landscape impact and planning context. |
Chew Stoke – Summary
| 5% Growth | Opportunities | Constraints | Option presented | Rationale |
|
21 dwellings over the Plan Period |
|
|
Yes |
A site to the north of the village is being considered for development. Although the land is classified as Grade 1 agricultural, it is viewed as a more sustainable location due to its proximity to the primary/secondary school, doctor’s surgery, and bus stops. Further assessment of the agricultural land quality will be required, but the potential loss is expected to be minimal. |
Clutton – Summary
| 5% Growth | Opportunities | Constraints | Option presented | Rationale |
|
25 dwellings over the Plan Period |
|
|
Yes |
Land to the west of the A37 is being considered for development, reflecting Clutton’s strategic location along this corridor and the direction of growth supported by the Neighbourhood Plan. Initial growth would be proportionate to the size of the village, with potential for further phases. This could support delivery of the permitted farm shop and wider development opportunities. |
Corston – Summary
| 5% Growth | Opportunities | Constraints | Option presented | Rationale |
|
11 dwellings over the Plan Period |
|
|
No |
Due to the constraints identified and the absence of a primary school, no site options are proposed. However, community-led opportunities (Pathway 1), including specialist or affordable housing, could be explored to meet local needs. |
Freshford – Summary
| 5% Growth | Opportunities | Constraints | Option presented | Rationale |
|
15 dwellings over the Plan Period |
|
|
No |
Due to the constraints identified, including limited primary school capacity and location within the Cotswolds National Landscape, no site options are proposed. However, community-led opportunities (Pathway 1), including affordable or specialist housing, could be explored to support local needs. |
Farmborough – Summary
| 5% Growth | Opportunities | Constraints | Option presented | Rationale |
|
28 dwellings over the Plan Period |
|
|
Yes |
Sites to the south of the village, accessed from Timsbury Road, are being considered for proportionate growth. A further phase of development may also be appropriate, subject to assessment, to support wider community needs and infrastructure. |
High Littleton and Hallatrow – Summary
| 5% Growth | Opportunities | Constraints | Option presented | Rationale |
|
45 dwellings over the Plan Period |
|
|
Yes |
Due to the high landscape sensitivity around High Littleton, only limited options have been identified. However, there is potential for smaller-scale growth in Hallatrow, which may offer a more appropriate location for proportionate development, subject to further assessment. |
Pensford – Summary
| 5% Growth | Opportunities | Constraints | Option presented | Rationale |
|
25 dwellings over the Plan Period |
|
|
No |
Due to the constraints identified, no site options are proposed. However, opportunities for community-led growth (Pathway 1), including affordable housing through rural exception sites, could be explored. |
Temple Cloud – Summary
| 5% Growth | Opportunities | Constraints | Option presented | Rationale |
|
30 dwellings over the Plan Period |
|
|
Yes |
As a key location on the A37, the council considers growth beyond 5% could be appropriate. However, any development must carefully address constraints. |
Timsbury – Summary
| 5% Growth | Opportunities | Constraints | Option presented | Rationale |
|
59 dwellings over the Plan Period |
|
|
Yes |
In addition to the existing Placemaking Plan allocation to the east of the village, new sites to the west and centre of Timsbury have been promoted. |